why dont you accept people’s offers of themselves as food or their limbs or w/e

There are reasons. Namely, I’m a hunter. Also, I eat a certain sort and like to choose.

Allow me to frame this in a way that may make sense. Would you eat the random, possibly despondent, possibly ill cow that turned up on your doorstep? Now imagine it is sentient and wants to make its death your responsibility and not theirs?

Your body is your business. I have no judgement or complaint with that. Please don’t try to turn my meals into complicated ethical discussions to make your life easier. It only complicates mine.

That is not fair to me. Don’t you think?

punkrockpixiegirl:

simonalkenmayer:

Humbug

Why do humans feel the need to “split hairs” until they’ve turned a stack of horse brush leavings into a mink stoll?

Answer me that.

Is it pride? Narcissism? Is it a control mechanism to feel more secure in their environment?

I would say it’s a mixture of pride and the need for control.

I assume so.

Humbug

Why do humans feel the need to “split hairs” until they’ve turned a stack of horse brush leavings into a mink stoll?

Answer me that.

Is it pride? Narcissism? Is it a control mechanism to feel more secure in their environment?

Assart

v. inf. Now, I know what you’re thinking. “This has to be an insult!” You’re wrong. It means to turn the land within a forest into farmland by cutting down all the trees. It was considered a grave offense, oft times punishable by death. So when you say someone does ass-art, just know that to me they’ve been accused of being a lumberjack.

Example: Assarting the King’s hunting ground is a sure way to get a good stretch in your neck.

Did I Shave My Legs For This?

systlin:

simonalkenmayer:

moonbard:

thehornedwitch:

simonalkenmayer:

missatheist32blog:

simonalkenmayer:

missatheist32blog:

fenland-witch:

sister-forget-me-not:

simonalkenmayer:

ekinsellaauthor:

simonalkenmayer:

Today I witnessed men mocking a woman for having hairy legs and underarms. I have something to say about this.

Firstly, the shaving of legs is a new fashion trend. It was done a bit in the 20′s, but honestly, it wasn’t until the forties that anyone gave a damn. Before that, no one saw your legs, because they wee covered in skirts. Men didn’t even know women HAD legs.

Slight exaggeration, but still quite meaningful.

In the last 70 years, men have gone from not knowing and not caring one bit about female body hair, to completely transforming their ideal feminine counterpart into a hairless model. Men like to tout masculinity as being impervious, but I’ll warrant you, you can watch them evolve with the feedback of marketing scams run on their little mammalian brains.

Did Queen Victoria have shaved legs…well, let’s first establish that yes, she did actually have legs. But were they hairless? During her 60-odd year reign, did she employ some servant to come pluck out her hairs?

Did Queen Elizabeth have hairless legs? 44 years of reign, at the time the longest reigning monarch of British history, but no, you’re right. She probably had the Lady of the Royal Chamber rake on a good lather before she went out in her Spanish farthingale.

Did Cleopatra have a straight razor? Did Helen of Troy? These are two women who literally destroyed nations with their beauty and the lust men had for them. Do you think they had shaved legs? What about their underarms?

Now, yes, there were traditions of removing hair. The Roman women, for example, plucked their hair out of their underarms, but I promise you…no one sat about for hours having their legs plucked with tweezers. And if they did, they had a lot of time and money to spare.

Do you know who Boudicca is? She was an Icenian queen during the first century. She led a rebellion against Roman factions at Londinium. 

Famously, she said, “This is done with the resolve of a woman. Men may live as slaves if they wish.”

She leveled three Roman outposts, well-established settlements. And came to Londinium with an army decked out in stolen Roman arms. They razed the city to the ground with fires so thick that an ash layer still exists in the stria of the City of London to this very day. As she rode through the old city on her chariot, with her Roman spear in hand, poised to launch it through the throat of a fleeing patrician, did she pause her assault to wonder…

Did I shave my legs for this?

As the man fell to the ground, choking on his own blood and the ash from the searing fires, do you think he looked up at this queen, this woman defiant and majestic, and thought, “Ye gods, what hirsuit underarms!”

I wonder how many plucked Roman women were trampled by that carriage.

I wonder if Anne Bonny, the notorious pirate ever was mocked by her male crew for having a fluffy undercarriage.

I wonder if when Annie Oakley, at 15, beat her crackshot future husband at a shooting contest, he looked at her little knees and thought, “Not this one. She’s too furry.”

I wonder if Anne Boleyn was beheaded for wearing a pair of furry britches beneath her skirts.

I wonder, if while He suckled as an infant, resplendent in holy fire and divinity, the newborn Jesus Christ, tucked His wee face to the crook of His Virgin Mother’s arm and let out a squeal at the ghastly sight of her unshaven underarms. Or if when He was installing himself in her abdomen, He gave a moment’s pause to think, “Dear Me, what am I doing, shoving myself into this horribly hairy wench?”

The answer to all of these is…No. Of course not, you fucking idiot.

Body hair exists for a reason, you stupid semi-hairless apes. Don’t you ever wonder why you still have it? I will tell you why. It provides necessary warmth, not just with insulation, but with the way your anatomy functions. Air catches the hairs and lifts them, causing a tickle that forces the follicle to swell into goose flesh, warming the skin through motion. It provides protection from the sun. And in the regions where it is thickest, it guards against the elements, keeps out parasites, and keeps your sensitive areas like your eyes, from being drowned in sweat. It even cushions and reduces the likelihood of heat rashes and chafing in the parts of you that touch. Hair is important. It wasn’t just Sampson who gained strength from it.

And I wonder, if while Sampson was laid low, his power sapped, if he looked up at the gorgeous Delilah with her treacherous shears and thought… “Why didn’t she pluck her eyebrows!”

Power is walking into a room with nothing in hand, and doing just fine.

Beauty is standing as you are, but embodying all that is graceful and powerful about the female condition.

And judging a woman on a trend that is younger then my oldest knee-length hemline is an act of such supreme stupidity and transient masculinity that I cannot even describe how ridiculous I find it. But men are the ones who are rational, yes? Men and all their manly manliness are immune to fads and trends and “girly fashion shit”, right, “bruh”?

Women have hair on their bodies same as you. You seem to do just fine wearing yours. Why do you begrudge her hers?

I say we start a new trend, where females begin to harass the worst offenders for having hairy legs. I shan’t be pleased if in 70 years, I am not seeing all men in shorts looking like the backside of a baby from the knee down. I want to see hordes of women tracking down these men who label a type of deception as beauty, and demanding they carve off their top layer of skin and fur. I want to hear these men who cannot see valor, fortitude, strength, and hair as beautiful, squeak when they walk.

And then I want all humans to embrace that which makes them soft and healthy, and stop rewriting history by turning it into one inglorious quest for vanity.

Reblogging half because of the painful accuracy and half because this mentions Anne Bonny. No one in Shattered Seas has any issues with her fluffy undercarriage 😛
Let your forest cover the land however much you want ladies. If anyone requires you to remove a piece of yourself to appease their sense of aesthetic, they can kindly go fuck themselves.

Well said. Couldn’t agree more.

Bravo!

This! This is why I’m not pressuring my 14yr old to start shaving! If she wants to, she will. It’s her choice and no one else’s!!

Shaving armpits is good for hygiene, doing the eyebrows makes your eyes stand out (although I’m a bit lazy) and helps to keep hair follicle inflamation away in my experience, but I honestly don’t see any utility to shaving anywhere else (legs, bikini area). It’s just one more thing that is more socially acceptable just because. 

The “hygiene” argument is not entirely true. I can explain why, but only if you care to hear it.

I’ve read that the hair actually makes the environment better for bacterial growth and reproduction and I observe that when I shave more regularly I smell a lot less whith the same hygiene habits otherwise. But yeah, go on I’m interested. 

You have to think in terms of evolution. Which is more deadly? A bacteria that smells badly, or the bacteria that infects the open sores caused by skin rubbing against skin?

To contradict, I started smelling a lot better when i stopped shaving my armpits. Before I’d get sores. Big, nasty, weeping things full of puss.
Now that I’ve stopped, yeah, I smell more like sweat, but the easy way to prevent that is to wipe under your armpits with a damp cloth and some soap. Treat it like your head, which also sweats, and shampoo during your shower. It’s not super difficult to prevent the bacteria that smells weird.
I dunno about everybody else, but i’m way happier not having open wounds opening on my armpits. Also my deodorant lasts longer now, because my slick sweaty naked armpits aren’t making it slough off. It sticks to hair MUCH better than bare skin.

A good middle ground is to trim it to be an inch or so long. No awful razor burn and it’s a bit more contained. Though I’m a guy so I don’t care as much. I did get made fun of when I was a teenager- “it looks like you’re smuggling hedgehogs” so possibly why I bother at all.

Also it functions like natural diffusers for pheromones.

Yes

Why is no one bringing up the fact that if you shave, you can’t braid little charms into your pit hair and pubes. 

And leg hair, for that matter, if it’s long and thick enough. 

And this is coming from someone who hates feeling stubbly anywhere and shaves everything below her neck, but c’mon. This is the next Thing, you guys; braiding little beads into your body hair. 

If I could stand having body hair (my own preference, I prefer to be smooth) I’d totally do it. 

*snorts*

profeminist:

Source

“Broflake. Can you use it in a sentence?”

“My last post about the Wonder Woman screening brought an instant avalanche of broflakes into my comments.”

*chuckles*

Fopdoodles, all.

Did I Shave My Legs For This?

simonalkenmayer:

jamisings:

simonalkenmayer:

simonalkenmayer:

Today I witnessed men mocking a woman for having hairy legs and underarms. I have something to say about this.

Firstly, the shaving of legs is a new fashion trend. It was done a bit in the 20′s, but honestly, it wasn’t until the forties that anyone gave a damn. Before that, no one saw your legs, because they wee covered in skirts. Men didn’t even know women HAD legs.

Slight exaggeration, but still quite meaningful.

In the last 70 years, men have gone from not knowing and not caring one bit about female body hair, to completely transforming their ideal feminine counterpart into a hairless model. Men like to tout masculinity as being impervious, but I’ll warrant you, you can watch them evolve with the feedback of marketing scams run on their little mammalian brains.

Did Queen Victoria have shaved legs…well, let’s first establish that yes, she did actually have legs. But were they hairless? During her 60-odd year reign, did she employ some servant to come pluck out her hairs?

Did Queen Elizabeth have hairless legs? 44 years of reign, at the time the longest reigning monarch of British history, but no, you’re right. She probably had the Lady of the Royal Chamber rake on a good lather before she went out in her Spanish farthingale.

Did Cleopatra have a straight razor? Did Helen of Troy? These are two women who literally destroyed nations with their beauty and the lust men had for them. Do you think they had shaved legs? What about their underarms?

Now, yes, there were traditions of removing hair. The Roman women, for example, plucked their hair out of their underarms, but I promise you…no one sat about for hours having their legs plucked with tweezers. And if they did, they had a lot of time and money to spare.

Do you know who Boudicca is? She was an Icenian queen during the first century. She led a rebellion against Roman factions at Londinium. 

Famously, she said, “This is done with the resolve of a woman. Men may live as slaves if they wish.”

She leveled three Roman outposts, well-established settlements. And came to Londinium with an army decked out in stolen Roman arms. They razed the city to the ground with fires so thick that an ash layer still exists in the stria of the City of London to this very day. As she rode through the old city on her chariot, with her Roman spear in hand, poised to launch it through the throat of a fleeing patrician, did she pause her assault to wonder…

Did I shave my legs for this?

As the man fell to the ground, choking on his own blood and the ash from the searing fires, do you think he looked up at this queen, this woman defiant and majestic, and thought, “Ye gods, what hirsuit underarms!”

I wonder how many plucked Roman women were trampled by that carriage.

I wonder if Anne Bonny, the notorious pirate ever was mocked by her male crew for having a fluffy undercarriage.

I wonder if when Annie Oakley, at 15, beat her crackshot future husband at a shooting contest, he looked at her little knees and thought, “Not this one. She’s too furry.”

I wonder if Anne Boleyn was beheaded for wearing a pair of furry britches beneath her skirts.

I wonder, if while He suckled as an infant, resplendent in holy fire and divinity, the newborn Jesus Christ, tucked His wee face to the crook of His Virgin Mother’s arm and let out a squeal at the ghastly sight of her unshaven underarms. Or if when He was installing himself in her abdomen, He gave a moment’s pause to think, “Dear Me, what am I doing, shoving myself into this horribly hairy wench?”

The answer to all of these is…No. Of course not, you fucking idiot.

Body hair exists for a reason, you stupid semi-hairless apes. Don’t you ever wonder why you still have it? I will tell you why. It provides necessary warmth, not just with insulation, but with the way your anatomy functions. Air catches the hairs and lifts them, causing a tickle that forces the follicle to swell into goose flesh, warming the skin through motion. It provides protection from the sun. And in the regions where it is thickest, it guards against the elements, keeps out parasites, and keeps your sensitive areas like your eyes, from being drowned in sweat. It even cushions and reduces the likelihood of heat rashes and chafing in the parts of you that touch. Hair is important. It wasn’t just Sampson who gained strength from it.

And I wonder, if while Sampson was laid low, his power sapped, if he looked up at the gorgeous Delilah with her treacherous shears and thought… “Why didn’t she pluck her eyebrows!”

Power is walking into a room with nothing in hand, and doing just fine.

Beauty is standing as you are, but embodying all that is graceful and powerful about the female condition.

And judging a woman on a trend that is younger then my oldest knee-length hemline is an act of such supreme stupidity and transient masculinity that I cannot even describe how ridiculous I find it. But men are the ones who are rational, yes? Men and all their manly manliness are immune to fads and trends and “girly fashion shit”, right, “bruh”?

Women have hair on their bodies same as you. You seem to do just fine wearing yours. Why do you begrudge her hers?

I say we start a new trend, where females begin to harass the worst offenders for having hairy legs. I shan’t be pleased if in 70 years, I am not seeing all men in shorts looking like the backside of a baby from the knee down. I want to see hordes of women tracking down these men who label a type of deception as beauty, and demanding they carve off their top layer of skin and fur. I want to hear these men who cannot see valor, fortitude, strength, and hair as beautiful, squeak when they walk.

And then I want all humans to embrace that which makes them soft and healthy, and stop rewriting history by turning it into one inglorious quest for vanity.

As with all things, there are outlying examples, lists of qualifications, explanations that can be made.

I can modify anything I write for a time, a place, a group, but I will stand by all my statements and insist: BEAUTY DOES NOT RELY ON LEG HAIR. I detest this modern aesthetic. I think it is as ridiculous as Dewbeaters, foot binding, codpieces, ruffs, neckties, low pants, or pinafores.

It’s all ridiculous.

Humans are dulcaps, and I cannot be clear in how much I detest it.

You’re free to dislike it if you want. I just have an objection to the thought that the removal of body hair is a relatively new thing. Sugaring, a form of epilation, has been around since 1900 BC, for instance. So women and men have been removing facial and body hair for a long, long time. 

Ultimately it should be up to the individual, of course. I LIKE shaving my armpits, legs, and forearms. I love the way my hairless legs feel when I put my jeans on. I like the feel of bed sheets on my hairless forearms. I like the way the antiperspirant stick I use glides over freshly shaved pits. I’m all about these sensations to the point where I shave every single day no matter if I’m going out or staying home. Because I have Polycystic Ovary Syndrome I’m prone to being hairier than your average woman. Add to it the fact that my mom’s paternal side of the family tree tended towards hairiness…. Heck, at 3 years old my nephew was so hairy he was like a little blond werewolf. 

This thing goes two ways. If a woman doesn’t like to shave/wax/whatever she shouldn’t have to. But if she likes it (or if a man likes it for that matter as I’ve seen many men being put down for not being hairy enough) then people should back the fuck off and let her shave. I used to be a big fan of film writer & director Kevin Smith. Ultimately it wasn’t that I grew out of fart jokes but his own fan base that drove me away. When I talk about feminists who told me what I’m “allowed” to do with MY own body according to their orders it’s from there I’m drawing. I’ve had them attack me for choosing to shave, tell me that I’m “not allowed” to have a breast reduction because they “said so,” told how to dress, told to have sex with strangers, etc. Like if they thought they owned MY body. And I still get some of this to a degree. I got so much anonymous hate e-mail sent to me over the fact I don’t wear eye makeup I finally had to make a video showing I can’t apply it and I have bad reactions to it. (E-mails stopped so it worked.) I often get people calling my curly hair “cringy” and complaining it’s “80′s hair.” 

Forgive me, I’m getting off topic and overly emotional. This is just something that gets to me as, not from YOU, Simon, but from others, I’ve seen a fuckton of hypocrisy from people who one minute say a woman should be allowed to do with her body as she pleases and the next tells me that I need to “go to a bar and find a stranger to fuck so you’ll feel better about yourself” just because I said I want a breast reduction. 

Do as you like, was my message, but never let the aesthetics of another human pressure you into doing anything with which you are not comfortable.

I haven’t any hair. I cannot imagine how it feels, except that I find it soft to the touch. I despise hypocrisy and vanity and all things that shift swiftly, by which no one remarks upon as being new or changeable.

The fact is, my friend, that while removal of hair has always happened, likely will, it was not a STANDARD. People were not mocked for it, belittled for it, bullied for it. Women can be strong without doing it and always have been.

It angers me when young women feel they must become something or they will not be taken seriously. Women HAVE ALL THEY NEED. They have everything. There is nothing that can alter that or add to it LEAST OF ALL HAIR REMOVAL.

So do as you like ladies. If a man belittles you for not shaving, he is a jackass. Tune him out, cut him off, call him an asshole and then come chat with us, the people who aren’t insane.

I like my women like I like my weapons, tempered and keen.

The fact is, there have been hair removal traditions for centuries, but they were not predominant, the only path. They were for people who could afford it. They were not a standard of beauty. They were not the end all, be all. They were not something that determined a woman’s fitness to be called beautiful.

Not at all.

I genralize. Why? Because history if long. Sons long. I cannot make a point without someone comingnin to qualify “well, actually.” Go on. Qualify to your detriment. It bothers me not one wit.

The point that stands and will stand, is that body hair should not be a determining factor when it comes to beauty. If you choose to do it, fine. If not, fine. By no one has the right, nor indeed the need, to tell you that you are a monster or ugly or anything else, when you choose not to.

I’m sure all these women removed hair at some point. Most do. By so did men. Andit wasn’t a standard, and it wasn’t a constant.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑