Did I Shave My Legs For This?

drakeb137:

fenland-witch:

simonalkenmayer:

rhdah:

simonalkenmayer:

rhdah:

simonalkenmayer:

rhdah:

missatheist32blog:

thehornedwitch:

simonalkenmayer:

missatheist32blog:

simonalkenmayer:

missatheist32blog:

fenland-witch:

sister-forget-me-not:

simonalkenmayer:

ekinsellaauthor:

simonalkenmayer:

Today I witnessed men mocking a woman for having hairy legs and underarms. I have something to say about this.

Firstly, the shaving of legs is a new fashion trend. It was done a bit in the 20′s, but honestly, it wasn’t until the forties that anyone gave a damn. Before that, no one saw your legs, because they wee covered in skirts. Men didn’t even know women HAD legs.

Slight exaggeration, but still quite meaningful.

In the last 70 years, men have gone from not knowing and not caring one bit about female body hair, to completely transforming their ideal feminine counterpart into a hairless model. Men like to tout masculinity as being impervious, but I’ll warrant you, you can watch them evolve with the feedback of marketing scams run on their little mammalian brains.

Did Queen Victoria have shaved legs…well, let’s first establish that yes, she did actually have legs. But were they hairless? During her 60-odd year reign, did she employ some servant to come pluck out her hairs?

Did Queen Elizabeth have hairless legs? 44 years of reign, at the time the longest reigning monarch of British history, but no, you’re right. She probably had the Lady of the Royal Chamber rake on a good lather before she went out in her Spanish farthingale.

Did Cleopatra have a straight razor? Did Helen of Troy? These are two women who literally destroyed nations with their beauty and the lust men had for them. Do you think they had shaved legs? What about their underarms?

Now, yes, there were traditions of removing hair. The Roman women, for example, plucked their hair out of their underarms, but I promise you…no one sat about for hours having their legs plucked with tweezers. And if they did, they had a lot of time and money to spare.

Do you know who Boudicca is? She was an Icenian queen during the first century. She led a rebellion against Roman factions at Londinium. 

Famously, she said, “This is done with the resolve of a woman. Men may live as slaves if they wish.”

She leveled three Roman outposts, well-established settlements. And came to Londinium with an army decked out in stolen Roman arms. They razed the city to the ground with fires so thick that an ash layer still exists in the stria of the City of London to this very day. As she rode through the old city on her chariot, with her Roman spear in hand, poised to launch it through the throat of a fleeing patrician, did she pause her assault to wonder…

Did I shave my legs for this?

As the man fell to the ground, choking on his own blood and the ash from the searing fires, do you think he looked up at this queen, this woman defiant and majestic, and thought, “Ye gods, what hirsuit underarms!”

I wonder how many plucked Roman women were trampled by that carriage.

I wonder if Anne Bonny, the notorious pirate ever was mocked by her male crew for having a fluffy undercarriage.

I wonder if when Annie Oakley, at 15, beat her crackshot future husband at a shooting contest, he looked at her little knees and thought, “Not this one. She’s too furry.”

I wonder if Anne Boleyn was beheaded for wearing a pair of furry britches beneath her skirts.

I wonder, if while He suckled as an infant, resplendent in holy fire and divinity, the newborn Jesus Christ, tucked His wee face to the crook of His Virgin Mother’s arm and let out a squeal at the ghastly sight of her unshaven underarms. Or if when He was installing himself in her abdomen, He gave a moment’s pause to think, “Dear Me, what am I doing, shoving myself into this horribly hairy wench?”

The answer to all of these is…No. Of course not, you fucking idiot.

Body hair exists for a reason, you stupid semi-hairless apes. Don’t you ever wonder why you still have it? I will tell you why. It provides necessary warmth, not just with insulation, but with the way your anatomy functions. Air catches the hairs and lifts them, causing a tickle that forces the follicle to swell into goose flesh, warming the skin through motion. It provides protection from the sun. And in the regions where it is thickest, it guards against the elements, keeps out parasites, and keeps your sensitive areas like your eyes, from being drowned in sweat. It even cushions and reduces the likelihood of heat rashes and chafing in the parts of you that touch. Hair is important. It wasn’t just Sampson who gained strength from it.

And I wonder, if while Sampson was laid low, his power sapped, if he looked up at the gorgeous Delilah with her treacherous shears and thought… “Why didn’t she pluck her eyebrows!”

Power is walking into a room with nothing in hand, and doing just fine.

Beauty is standing as you are, but embodying all that is graceful and powerful about the female condition.

And judging a woman on a trend that is younger then my oldest knee-length hemline is an act of such supreme stupidity and transient masculinity that I cannot even describe how ridiculous I find it. But men are the ones who are rational, yes? Men and all their manly manliness are immune to fads and trends and “girly fashion shit”, right, “bruh”?

Women have hair on their bodies same as you. You seem to do just fine wearing yours. Why do you begrudge her hers?

I say we start a new trend, where females begin to harass the worst offenders for having hairy legs. I shan’t be pleased if in 70 years, I am not seeing all men in shorts looking like the backside of a baby from the knee down. I want to see hordes of women tracking down these men who label a type of deception as beauty, and demanding they carve off their top layer of skin and fur. I want to hear these men who cannot see valor, fortitude, strength, and hair as beautiful, squeak when they walk.

And then I want all humans to embrace that which makes them soft and healthy, and stop rewriting history by turning it into one inglorious quest for vanity.

Reblogging half because of the painful accuracy and half because this mentions Anne Bonny. No one in Shattered Seas has any issues with her fluffy undercarriage 😛
Let your forest cover the land however much you want ladies. If anyone requires you to remove a piece of yourself to appease their sense of aesthetic, they can kindly go fuck themselves.

Well said. Couldn’t agree more.

Bravo!

This! This is why I’m not pressuring my 14yr old to start shaving! If she wants to, she will. It’s her choice and no one else’s!!

Shaving armpits is good for hygiene, doing the eyebrows makes your eyes stand out (although I’m a bit lazy) and helps to keep hair follicle inflamation away in my experience, but I honestly don’t see any utility to shaving anywhere else (legs, bikini area). It’s just one more thing that is more socially acceptable just because. 

The “hygiene” argument is not entirely true. I can explain why, but only if you care to hear it.

I’ve read that the hair actually makes the environment better for bacterial growth and reproduction and I observe that when I shave more regularly I smell a lot less whith the same hygiene habits otherwise. But yeah, go on I’m interested. 

You have to think in terms of evolution. Which is more deadly? A bacteria that smells badly, or the bacteria that infects the open sores caused by skin rubbing against skin?

To contradict, I started smelling a lot better when i stopped shaving my armpits. Before I’d get sores. Big, nasty, weeping things full of puss.
Now that I’ve stopped, yeah, I smell more like sweat, but the easy way to prevent that is to wipe under your armpits with a damp cloth and some soap. Treat it like your head, which also sweats, and shampoo during your shower. It’s not super difficult to prevent the bacteria that smells weird.
I dunno about everybody else, but i’m way happier not having open wounds opening on my armpits. Also my deodorant lasts longer now, because my slick sweaty naked armpits aren’t making it slough off. It sticks to hair MUCH better than bare skin.

Aaah I think that’s because of the razor, and a good hack would be using a razor that has been used for instance on your legs. Even if you don’t usually shave your legs, you don’t have to do it all, just do it a little bit and it will be enough (that is if you wanna shave). BTW deodorant sometimes comes with substances that also help you sweat less, so it’s meant mostly for the skin. Using one of those will be good if you ever shave again. It also prevents skin conditions. 

As there seem to be no guys weighing in on this… I’d really just like to take a minute to say that, by and large, most guys don’t really care to go out with women who look like guys.

When a woman wears the body hair she was born with and is therefore in her natural FEMALE state, she doesn’t look like a man, sir. She looks like a woman. Women have body hair. So what you’re actually saying is:

Men’s taste in women is utterly at the mercy of advertising campaigns, and in the last 70 years has grown to include that women be hairless, and therefore, if a woman wants a man, she should shave herself. 

Which is, of course, the most ridiculous and selfish thing a man could say to a woman. Therefore, women should reverse this offensive demand and insist that if men want women, they ought to do some sort of full body transformation, or die alone, without having procreated their deficient genes.

What I’m saying is that nobody likes hairy fat chicks like you.

Young man, check the description before you reply to things, and by the by, you have just demonstrated precisely the kind of jackass we are discussing. Thank you for that.

The type of person I’m describing is the type of person that continues society.

Hint: Society does in fact require people to have kids. Hairy women rate about a 3/10 for most guys.

Now they do, perhaps, (though I question the words “most” as an unfair generalization) thanks to the advertising campaigns of the 30’s and 40’s. Prior to that, men didn’t care. Which was entirely the point I was making.

Women have hair. Telling her that having hair isn’t feminine is ridiculous, as women have hair. It’s their natural condition. Therefore having hair is female and therefore feminine.

Men who belittle women for wearing the hair with which they were born are purely and simply, idiots. Especially the people who brought up the post in the first place.

*sigh* @rhdah me: woman, rarely shave and if I do it’s because I want to, married to a man, three kids. Try again.

@rhdah I’m not sure where you’re getting these stats, I’m gonna go with you’re making them up, but a lot of guys I know are either indifferent to women’s body hair or prefer women that don’t shave. I’m part of the later, and although if I’m with a women that shaves because she wants to I won’t mind at all I really don’t prefer being stabbed by prickly hair. Plus like Simon said it’s something bodies do naturally so why are we shaming people for it…

Thank you kindly for that addition.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: